A CCTV clip, roughly 20 seconds long, was all it took to set off a chain of official responses that would otherwise never have happened.
A show-cause letter. A police report.
A public statement from a state committee chairman.
All of it triggered not by an internal complaint, not by a supervisor flagging misconduct, but by footage that residents shared online after watching a contractor’s worker allegedly run over a stray dog with a pickup truck and drive away.
The incident took place at around 11.24am on May 15 in Puteri Wangsa, Ulu Tiram.
The dog, a brown stray, was left on the road after the impact. The driver came back, not to help the animal, but to collect its remains.
Residents who witnessed it confronted him at the scene.
A job outsourced, an oversight outsourced with it
When the video spread online, the Johor Bahru City Council (MBJB) was quick to clarify that the workers involved were not their direct employees.
They were from a private contractor appointed by MBJB to handle stray dog complaints in the area.
That distinction matters, but it also raises a question.
If the council hired a contractor to carry out work on its behalf, who was responsible for ensuring that work was done properly?
According to Johor Housing and Local Government Committee chairman Datuk Mohd Jafni Md Shukor, as reported by FMT, the contractor had allegedly failed to follow the required standard operating procedures and the terms of their appointment.
A show-cause letter has been issued. A police report has been filed.
“MBJB has also filed a police report to facilitate an investigation by the authorities for negligence, misconduct, abuse of power or violation of the law,” Mohd Jafni said.
What the video actually showed
Beyond the impact itself, witnesses said the workers had repeatedly tried and failed to catch the dog before the truck allegedly sped toward it. The footage, captured on CCTV rather than a phone, showed a red pickup truck moving through a residential street before the collision. The driver left, came back, and was confronted by residents before the clip made its way online.
Persatuan Haiwan Terbiar Malaysia (SAFM) called for an immediate investigation, stating plainly that driving a truck into an animal is not a method of stray control. The organisation urged MBJB, the Johor Department of Veterinary Services and the police to identify those responsible and act accordingly.
Accountability that only arrived with a camera
Possible consequences for the contractor now include suspension, contract termination, blacklisting and legal action.
Mohd Jafni also stressed that pet owners bear responsibility under the MBJB Dog Licensing By-Laws 1995 to keep their animals from roaming freely.
But the harder question sits underneath all of it.
If the SOP existed before May 15, why wasn’t it being followed? And if it was being followed up until the camera caught otherwise, what does that say about everything that happens when no one is filming?
Submit your story to ym.efillaerni@olleh and you may be featured on In Real Life Malaysia.
Read also: ‘I gave up my family to pursue my dreams’ Shares 34 YO M’sian woman – In Real Life
‘I gave up my family to pursue my dreams’ Shares 34 YO M’sian woman
More from Dogs
“My mother got rid of the family dog,” shares M’sian woman who went no-contact with her mother
In this story, a mother's cruelty destroyed her relationship with her own daughter, and it began with the family dog.
